pets
Oscar
February 21, 2007 - 8:08am | MelvixMy sister- and brother-in-law's dog Oscar has been featured in a newsletter for the Canaan breed. The article features lots of cute pictures of Oscar, who is a good boy.
This turtle is amazing
August 10, 2006 - 7:58pm | MelvixThis turtle acts kind of like a dog and also makes paintings. I had no idea you could train turtles. The web site is worth looking at, too.
Via boingboing.
Feist
May 8, 2006 - 6:07am | MelvixWhen I showed him a photo of Schatzi, a guy I know who grew up in the south said, "In South Carolina they'd call that a feist!" He explained that a feist is a catch-all for any kind of small hunting dog, usually of indiscriminate breed (except for the Treeing Feist, which is a recognized breed).
I was curious to know if that was the origin of the word feisty, so I looked it up on etymonline.com:
feisty
1896, Amer.Eng. from feist "small dog," from fice, fist Amer.Eng. 1805 "small dog," short for fysting curre "stinking cur," attested from 1529, from M.E. fysten, fisten "break wind" (1440), related to O.E. fisting "stink." The 1811 slang dictionary defines fice as "a small windy escape backwards, more obvious to the nose than ears; frequently by old ladies charged on their lap-dogs." Cf. also Dan. fise "to blow, to fart," and obs. Eng. askefise, lit. "fire-blower, ash-blower," from an unrecorded O.N. source, used in M.E. for a kind of bellows, but orig. "a term of reproach among northern nations for an unwarlike fellow who stayed at home in the chimney corner" [O.E.D.]
Funny.
Obedience school
May 2, 2006 - 7:16am | MelvixI've been taking Schatzi to obedience classes at Acoma Training Center, a dog training facility run by a woman named Trish Spradley. Next Monday will be the last class of an eight-week "novice" course. In our case, we were both novices, since the only things I knew about training a dog were from a pamphlet I paid ten cents for at a thrift store.
I get interesting responses from people when I tell them that I'm taking my dog to obedience classes. Some people are enthusiastic: "Good for you! Everyone should take their dogs to classes!" Some people are dismissive: "I've never had to take my dogs to obedience classes." Others regard obedience classes as a very nancy sort of endeavor and can barely find words for their contempt. (To those people, I say pish-posh!) Dog training is one of those subjects about which nearly everyone has strong opinions, whether they know anything about it or not.
As far as my own beliefs about Dogs and Their Proper Training goes, I am taking this approach for now: Whatever Trish says, I believe it. Trish says that there's no good reason to take your dog to a dog off-leash park. (What's the point of risking a fight?) Makes sense to me. She says your dog should be able to withstand a baloney rubdown from the neighbor's five-year-old kid without showing any interest in the baloney. Check. (When she was a girl, my niece was severely bitten in the face by my aunt's dog at a Mother's Day picnic when the dog decided that it wanted my niece's plate of cake.) Your dog shouldn't bark at other dogs when you walk her. Got it. Your dog shouldn't jump on people. Self explanatory. Your dog shouldn't bite people. (This one is hard for some people.) And so on. I don't have any problem believing anything Trish says because I've never seen anyone as good with dogs as Trish.
The classes work like this: About 30 of us stand around the perimiter of a big concrete-floored room with our dogs. We do heeling and sitting and downing drills for an hour, once a week. Trish walks around the room, giving advice and encouragement and correction over a wireless headset PA. "Your dog shouldn't be walking in front of you... Just relax... go ahead and pass each other just like you're at the mall... Good!... About turn to the right... Don't let blondie over there visit with her neighbor! No visiting... OK, now sit your dogs... They should be sitting right away... Good! Very good! Can you believe how good they are compared to the first day?"
The first class was... I don't quite know what to call it. "Hell" is a little extreme. A little. The dogs were barking and lunging and wandering and whining and basically going nuts. You could barely hear Trish over the PA as she assured us that by the third class they will have calmed down. But she was right. By the third class even the most mental of the dogs was better behaved than most dogs you see at the park.
Some of the dogs are harder cases than others and these are always the ones that Trish uses to demonstrate. If a dog shows signs of ignoring his owner, Trish takes him to the center of the circle and makes him listen. How? I don't know. Magic of some kind. Or her tone, a few well-timed tugs on the leash, the right kind of encouragement, a general air of authority. A few seconds after she takes the leash they are usually looking up at her and listening. I suppose that if you spent enough time with professional dog people you'd see others who were this good or better with dogs, but I haven't.
Trish wasn't at last night's class so one of her assistants ran things. She showed us a new method for downing our dogs and plugged the "advanced novice" class by demonstrating some of the hand signals our dogs could learn if we signed up. The assistants are also great with dogs, but Trish's absence solidified an idea that had been forming in my mind over the last few weeks: A big part of her success with the dogs in the class is the way she can wrangle people. She's getting 30 strangers motivated to all walk around in a circle at the same time, stopping and starting and following her commands immediately, without question. Who is she talking to when she says "Good! Very good!" over the PA when we sit our dogs the right way? She's not talking to our dogs.
It seemed to me that at last night's class people were not listening as well as they could have. We were wandering, clumping together. One lady almost stepped on Schatzi's head. I found myself studying the stuff on the walls more than once, noticing for the first time who was sitting in the little gallery where people can watch the classes, looking into the kennels behind the desk where the trainers keep their dogs. At one point a woman with a little border collie actually dared to argue with the trainer about whether her dog was biting or not, which effectively shut the class down for a few long minutes as the trainer endeavored to show the lady the difference between biting and not biting. I kept thinking, "Trish would never stand for this!
In any case, it's been money well spent. Schatzi knows how to sit now, and heel (well, sort of), and lay down and come when I call her. Most of the time, anyway.
Schatzi!
March 13, 2006 - 8:57am | Melvix
The question of what kind of dog to get was made moot by this delightful 3-year-old beagle-dachshund mix. She goes by Schatzi, at least until we think up new sickeningly cute nicknames for her.
Couldn't ask for a better dog. Shall I list her virtues? Extremely cute. House trained. Very friendly. Well-mannered (although there isn't any apparent obedience training in her past). Good in the car and on a leash. Very enthusiastic about walks. Good with other dogs. The info from the shelter where I got her said she was given up by her owner, but I can't think of any reason why someone would willingly give up this dog.
In the minus column, she's afraid of cats. Especially cats who torment her (ie, our cats). But they seem to be working it out. As I write this, Frank and Schatzi have made some kind of truce and are sleeping in the same room. Kofi is outside puking up hairballs.
American Indian dog hoax?
March 9, 2006 - 8:08am | MelvixSpeaking of dog breeds, there is a fellow who claims to have reintroduced the "American Indian dog" as a breed.
I don't know much about dog breeds, or breeding, but I'm skeptical. The dogs are marketed as "the true descendants of the 'old dogs'", which smells fishy to me. The guy claims to have learned how to breed the dogs from talking to "elders." It sounds exactly like the kind of thing you'd say if you wanted to sell dogs to people who are overly interested in imitating native lifestyles and religion. Much of the evidence given to support the claim that these dogs are "authentic" is vaguely scientific at best, and generally based on similarities to dogs depicted in paintings and drawings of Native Americans.
There are detractors. This lengthy forum topic about the dogs and their breeder at the Museum of Hoaxes web site is worth reading.
There are some nice ironies here, too. As it turns out, there is a kind of feral dog that lives in isolated places in North Carolina (called the Carolina Dog) that may be an actual descendent of dogs originally brought to North America. Maybe.
But I really love this part: According to Wikipedia, the diminutive, ordinary, non-travois-pulling, non-plains travelling, often-annoying Chihuahua is "the oldest canine breed in North America." You see, Mexico is part of North America. Mexico had people living in it before Columbus came snooping around. If you like, you can think of those people as being "Indians." Indians who had dogs. Little tiny Indian dogs.
Dog dilemma
February 13, 2006 - 1:53pm | MelvixMy wife and I are thinking about getting a dog. We've never had a dog before. We've always been cat people.
Let me correct that. We're done thinking about getting a dog. Now we're in the thinking about what kind of dog to get.
I've wanted to get a pug for a long time, and so I've talked to a lot of people about pugs. Pugs seem to be a divisive breed among dog people. Anti-pug people say that they are disgusting and require too much maintenance. Apparently you have to clean out their face folds all the time. Pro-pug people say that they are excellent in every way. There's a guy down the street who has a pug. He told me they were "great dogs," but that they were "kinda gross as far as bodily fluids are concerned." I haven't had a chance to ask him to elaborate on this yet.
The primary concern is that the dog can't be a cat-eater. That's one of the reasons I favor the pug.
The ubiquitous pit bull is not out of the question either, as long as the dog can get along with our cats. In a way, a pit is a more practical choice because there are so many of them in the pound at any given moment. Same with chihuahuas. I like the idea of having a dog like a pit that can actually do something useful, like run off nighttime intruders. And I have yet to meet a pit bull I didn't like. A friend of mine has a great dog - a pit-lab mix. A cat-eater, unfortunately. I should mention that I got bit by a pit bull once when I was a kid, but apparently it didn't scar me mentally because I just remembered it recently when I was trying to remember all the pit bulls I've known. I guess I didn't really like that dog much, so I have to take back my earlier statement about never meeting one I didn't like.
When it comes down to it, almost any dog will do, as long as they don't mind us putting little hats on them for laughs. And don't bother the cats.



